
USS Cole Bombing Trial Begins
PHOTO CAPTION: The damaged USS Cole is towed from Aden, Yemen, by the Military Sealift Command tug USNS Catawba on October 29, 2000, following an al-Qaeda terrorist bombing that killed 17 U.S. sailors and wounded 37 others. More than 26 years later, jury selection has begun in the military trial of a man accused of helping orchestrate the attack. (U.S. Marine Corps photo.)
More than 26 years after a terrorist bombing tore through the USS Cole and killed 17 American sailors, the long-delayed military trial of a man accused of helping orchestrate the attack has finally reached jury selection at Guantanamo Bay.
Proceedings began Monday, November 2, in the case against Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a 61-year-old Saudi national accused of playing a central role in the October 12, 2000, attack on the U.S. Navy destroyer in Yemen.
Al-Nashiri has been in American custody since 2002, but his case has remained tied up in legal disputes for years.
He pleaded not guilty as jury selection began and could face the death penalty if convicted.
For the families of the 17 sailors killed and the dozens of survivors, the proceedings represent a significant step toward a resolution that has been delayed for more than a quarter-century.
The Attack That Killed 17 American Sailors
On October 12, 2000, the USS Cole was refueling in the port of Aden, Yemen, when two suicide bombers approached the destroyer in a small boat loaded with explosives.
The attackers detonated the boat alongside the ship, ripping an enormous hole through its hull.
Seventeen sailors were killed and another 37 were wounded.
The explosion caused extensive flooding and damage, forcing surviving crew members to fight to keep the ship afloat while caring for the injured and recovering their fallen shipmates.
The bombing was one of the deadliest terrorist attacks against American military personnel in the years immediately preceding September 11, 2001.
Investigators attributed the attack to al-Qaeda.
Despite the extensive damage, the destroyer was eventually transported back to the United States for repairs and returned to service.
The sailors who survived the attack have lived with its consequences for more than two decades.
Accused Plotter Held in U.S. Custody Since 2002
Federal authorities accuse al-Nashiri of helping organize the USS Cole bombing and other attacks on maritime targets on behalf of al-Qaeda.
He was captured in 2002 and initially held by the CIA at secret detention facilities before being transferred to Guantanamo Bay.
During his time in CIA custody, al-Nashiri was subjected to abusive interrogation techniques, including waterboarding.
His treatment became a central issue in the military commission proceedings.
Defense attorneys have argued that his torture and subsequent mental health problems affected his ability to participate in his own defense.
They have also challenged the government's use of statements and other evidence connected to coercive CIA interrogations.
The resulting legal battles have contributed to years of delays.
Judge Rules Defendant Competent to Stand Trial
One of the final obstacles to jury selection was a dispute over al-Nashiri's mental competency.
Defense attorneys presented evaluations from civilian experts who concluded that he was not capable of meaningfully participating in the proceedings.
An Army psychiatrist who examined al-Nashiri also identified post-traumatic stress disorder and depression but concluded that he could understand the trial and assist his attorneys.
On October 30, Army Col. Matthew Fitzgerald, the military judge overseeing the case, ruled that al-Nashiri was competent to stand trial.
The decision cleared the way for jury selection to begin the following Monday.
The defense continues to challenge aspects of the proceedings and the evidence prosecutors intend to present.
Military Officers Being Selected for Historic Trial
Jury selection began November 2 at the military commission courtroom at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
The court started by questioning 18 military officers about their ability to serve impartially in the case.
The military commission plans to select a panel of 12 officers and six alternates from a potential pool of approximately 200 service members.
The process could take several weeks.
The judge told prospective panel members that the trial itself could last four to six months or longer, requiring a substantial commitment away from their regular military assignments.
Some officers immediately raised concerns about the length of the proceedings.
The case is the first death-penalty prosecution under Guantanamo's military commission system to reach jury selection.
However, jury selection is only the beginning of the trial process. Opening statements and the presentation of evidence have not yet begun.
Disputes Over Torture and Evidence Remain
Although jury selection is underway, several major legal disputes have not been fully resolved.
Defense attorneys continue questioning whether evidence obtained through coercive interrogation methods can be used against al-Nashiri.
A related dispute involves statements made by another former detainee whose interrogations were affected by allegations of CIA torture.
Judges overseeing separate Guantanamo cases have reached different conclusions about whether certain statements can be admitted.
The defense has sought additional records and asked the court to reconsider some earlier evidentiary decisions.
Al-Nashiri's attorneys have also argued that the lengthy proceedings and the effects of his treatment in custody have made it difficult to prepare an adequate defense.
Prosecutors maintain that the case can proceed.
These disputes could continue during the trial and potentially lead to further appeals.
Families Have Waited More Than a Quarter-Century
The passage of time is one of the most significant aspects of the case.
The USS Cole was attacked in 2000.
Al-Nashiri was captured in 2002.
Yet it was not until November 2026 that military officers began being selected to determine his guilt or innocence.
The prolonged proceedings have left families of the fallen sailors and survivors waiting decades for a final legal resolution.
The case also reflects the wider difficulties surrounding the Guantanamo military commission system, which was established to prosecute certain terrorism-related offenses outside the ordinary federal court system.
For families seeking accountability, the start of jury selection represents progress, but a verdict and sentence remain uncertain.
A Trial 26 Years in the Making
The USS Cole bombing remains one of the defining terrorist attacks against the U.S. Navy.
Seventeen sailors lost their lives during what should have been a routine refueling stop.
Their shipmates fought to save the destroyer, and the Navy continued its mission.
More than 26 years later, a military commission is finally beginning the process of selecting the officers who will hear the case against the man accused of helping plan the attack.
Al-Nashiri is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
The outcome remains uncertain, and the proceedings could continue for months or longer.
But for the USS Cole community, the long-awaited trial has reached a milestone that once seemed years away.
(Source: OAF Nation)










