Skip to content

Cart

Your cart is empty

Article: US cannot ban non-violent convicts from owning guns, appeals court rules

Illustrative photo of a Glock 17 handgun by Roman Poberezhnik via Unsplash

US cannot ban non-violent convicts from owning guns, appeals court rules

PHOTO CAPTION: Illustrative photo of a Glock 17 handgun by Roman Poberezhnik via Unsplash

 

 

By Brendan Pierson

(Reuters) - The U.S. government cannot ban people convicted of non-violent crimes from possessing guns, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday.

The 11-4 ruling from the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is the latest defeat for gun control laws in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year expanding gun rights nationwide.

The decision stems from a 2020 lawsuit by a Pennsylvania man, Bryan Range, who was barred under federal law from possessing a gun after pleading guilty to welfare fraud. He claimed the prohibition violated his right to bear arms under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

"We are very pleased that the 3rd Circuit has vindicated the rights of our client by faithfully applying the Supreme Court's decision," Range's lawyer, Peter Patterson, said in an email.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which enforces federal gun laws, declined to comment.

Range pleaded guilty in 1995 to committing welfare fraud in Pennsylvania in order to obtain $2,458 of food stamps, a misdemeanor punishable by up to five years' imprisonment. He was sentenced to three years of probation.

Federal criminal law generally bars people convicted of crimes punishable by more than a year in prison from possessing guns. Such crimes are usually felonies, but the law also includes some state misdemeanors, like Range's.

A federal judge ruled against Range in 2021. Last June, however, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects individuals' right to carry guns in public for self-defense, and that any restrictions on that right must be consistent with the nation's historical tradition of gun regulation.

Circuit Judge Thomas Hardiman wrote for the majority on Tuesday that the government had failed to point to any laws from the United States' founding establishing a tradition of disarming non-violent criminals.

Four judges dissented.

"Where, as here, the legislature has made a reasonable and considered judgment to disarm those who show disrespect for the law, it is not the place of unelected judges to substitute that judgment with their own," wrote Circuit Judge Cheryl Ann Krause, one of the dissenters.

 

(This story has been corrected to rectify the author of majority opinion in paragraph 9)

 

(Reporting By Brendan Pierson in New York; Editing by David Gregorio, Alexia Garamfalvi and Leslie Adler)

MORE FROM THE

OAF NATION NEWSROOM

A New Zealand Army soldier with the 161st Battery and U.S. Marines with 5th Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Company

New Zealand and Fiji finalizing defense agreement, Fiji PM says

New Zealand and Fiji are finalizing a defense agreement that will increase engagement between the two countries militaries and help build capacity and skills in the Fiji Defence Force, the Fijian p...

Read more
Members of the Latvian Special Operations Unit prepare to fire mortar rounds during bilateral training with U.S. Army Green Berets

NATO's east expects clearer Ukraine post-war member path at Vilnius summit

Members of NATO's eastern flank expect the military alliance's July summit in Vilnius will set Ukraine on a clearer path to membership, once its war with Russia ends, the countries said at a summit...

Read more
#3